“If voting is based on the concept you’ve got nothing to lose, well see, I think that needs to really be looked at. Because then what’s the point? You’ve got nothing to lose then what’s the point of even voting? You know, I mean from that concept. But to me, what I’m talking about with the voting is, non-voters being the largest political party because its obvious that no matter how much people vote the situation just continues to become favorable to the industrial ruling class, but not favorable to the citizens.”
“I’m not just trashing the voting system but I’m saying that there are times that nationally I don’t think its working.”
“They make promises and they break them. They make promises. They break them. They make promises. They break them. And so why even waste your energy? Why feed your energy to that lie?” – Voting and Politics.
“I’ll settle for the promise I want to hear, you know, just give me a promise. You don’t give me a plan. Don’t give me anything coherent. Don’t give me anything that makes sense. Just give me a promise and trash the other guy for being bad. That seems to be the criteria that the voters put out there.” – On Voters
“But you know before they had TV they used radio for programing. Before that they use newspapers. They’ve always used the church. They’ve always used patriotism. That programing takes place so that they can take the energy or the power of our intelligence and shape it to meet their program. Rather than allow us to use it to meet ours needs. The creator put us here. So we were biologically put here alright, to live a life. But when we get here then the miners, the the energy consumers, they come in here and they put us into this program.”
“Back then in that time when they told the stories they were communicating the knowledge of the people. Of the human beings. They were communicating an ancestral knowledge through these stories alright so this was teaching because this knowledge was being communicated to help maintain and keep the balance, because it was about respect. So that was teaching, that wasn’t programming. At some point programming became a part of the civilizing process. See programing is to imprint, so that they can disrupt the balance. They program human beings, then after a human being has become programed they no longer are in balance. When a human being is taught, they have balance.”
“When you destroy the language that people are in harmony with, this language goes with they’re thinking, see these vibrate in synchronlclty so to speak. They’re in tune. So when you destroy that language and you replace it with another language see now it’s a different tuning.”
“Evolution isn’t a fast thing. So, we’re evolving alright. Now, whether we’re evolving into our own extinction or we are evolving past that, we’re evolving. This isn’t something that you’re going to see. Evolution is about lifetimes. It isn’t something that we’re just going to see in our own. Now the technology itself, the technological evolution, it’s evolving way beyond our ability to deal with it and handle it and understand it, right. But maybe the technology is what’s feeding off us. Our energy is being fed to the technology. So you know, maybe in some kind of bizarre way the machines are raising us. Maybe we’re the cattle now. If you really think about it, because everything is being done to serve the God technology. And it is, basically everything that we’re doing. You, me, the good guys serve it. The bad guys serve it. You know the good guys they buy and consume in excess. The good guys they got a grudge against the bad guys because the bad guys don’t do it right with their polluting and all their stuff but yet the good guys go out here and they over consume. See so everybody’s serving the god technology. It’s what I’m saying about real thinking. Coherent thought has to be injected somewhere in here because the good guys and the bad guys are both just riding in different parts of the same train.”
“They make different sounds in the vibratory wavelengths or whatever. So maybe some of the words we use, we should have a better understanding of them rather than just use them out of habit and convenience.”
“They have the power? Well it depends on how you define power. I know that they have the means and the ability and the capabilities of violence. But those may be elements of power. I know they had the brutality, the capability and the brutality to maintain what they have, but I don’t know that I would call it power. Because that’s one of the things about authoritarianism you know. When you look at it, they had the technology to wreak havoc on us or they had the economics to wreak havoc on us or the military or the political thing to wreak havoc on us; these are things that are access to authority. I don’t necessarily look at them as being power…if I believe that their ability to produce and generate violence makes them powerful then I will never understand my own relationship to power. Because I’ll always look at that and know that I don’t have that. If I believe that I got to get money to be powerful see then I’ll never recognize myself because I’m externalizing what power really is. See, in those teachings you were talking about a long long time ago see this is what was being passed. powers In here mm-mm but now see everybody nobody so ya know so people talk go around they talk about personal power look for the personal power but see it all gets negated because everything is casually we use these words, ‘they have power over us,’ ‘the powers that be,’ casually. Frivolously. Not understanding every time we make the incantation we’re planting it. So we’re not changing anything about the perception of how we perceive. Which is what they don’t want us to do. If you look at it, break it down to pragmatic things you know, on one level it is a mutation of power. It’s not power on it’s own. It’s like you take uranium out and you convert the being of uranium, that energy, and they call it power but what it is its a mutation of natural power that they control. See but real power they can’t control.”
“I think more than ‘the powers that be,’ I think we should call them the authoritarians. That’s what they are, they’re the authoritarians.”
“Spirit being energy. Spirit, being energy. We are spirit being energy, alright. See, we were taught about spirit being energy. That’s what we used to be taught. But with programing we’re not taught that. With programing we’re taught that there’s something wrong with us.”
“Reality and illusion. Reality, and the illusion. The parallels.”
“Religion’s not about spiritual values. It’s about religious values.”
“I think people need to think about all of it because spirituality is about us individually being responsible for our participation in reality. And about maintaining a balance. To me that’s what it is. Responsibility. It’s about us. We’re responsible for whatever waves we make. Religion tells us that in order to be responsible we have to submit to their authoritarianism, because there was something wrong with us for being born. See so spirituality is about, life is a gift. And we have a responsibility to live that gift. Recognize and live that gift. That’s what Spirituality is about. Religion is, in a way, is almost like a sin. Because we are born with original sin. There’s something wrong with us. So religion has basically got this way of saying life is a sin and therefore we owe God obedience. And in order to show that obedience that we owe to God, we got to listen to their male dominated chain-of-command. So when you look at it, they call that being responsible. But I call that being spiritually irresponsible because we’re now giving over our responsibility to them.”
“Were about the religious justification to possess the souls of the godless pagans. To possess their souls. That’s what it was about. I mean it actually transitions into land and dollars and authority and shit like that, right. -The Inquisitions
“Dealing with Christianity, yeah the Catholic Church were the most blatant about it but they had been around longer. But once the church started dividing up and they took their other identities and stuff they still basically–they all did wrong, every one of them–if you’re gonna talk about following the loving God’s teachings they all misbehaved whether they were Protestants, Presbaterians. Before it was all done, and I say that as a native person because they came and they took land alright and they rationalized, accepted it or whatever, the extermination of a people.”
“There’s the Catholics and then who broke off from them, the Protestants? Protestants were pretty active up here in the North. There were more Catholics so obviously they would be more active in some ways. Protestants hadn’t been around that long yet by the time they got here, they’d been around what, a couple hundred years, but you got a thousand years worth of Catholic indoctrination going on, so by the time they got here I’d say that the Protestants or whoever the non-catholics were, the anglos that came, they held their own with the Catholics, there just weren’t as many of them.”
“It isn’t about trashing religion. Because it’s their Karma, so I’m not gonna go there. Religion has its own Karma. So this isn’t about trashing. This is really not about Catholics and Protestants. Its about Western technologic civilized religion not following a spiritual reality. That’s what this is really about.”
“If I agree to sit down and do it. Then use it. That’s pretty much why I’m sitting here. – On putting interview on YouTube. ~